(Holly, a student from L.A.) Welcome the blog I brought with me to college. holly_hunt@brown.edu

 

Hi Tumblr, I have failed at keeping up here! While I read my feed every day, I do more and more of my random-thought-spewing on G+. But I have to say that I don’t follow quite the same entertaining mix of anime/cartoon enthusiasts and extremely active politicos on G+. It’s just not as fun.

I am alive. Today I went to a meetup in a new neighborhood for me, and listened to a few business folk present before chatting with a few locals about living in Hong Kong. A surprisingly large percentage of people I talked to work in private equity. This city seems to be all finance, even in tech circles.

Then I got MacDonald’s as it is kind of late here and try finding protein-heavy “food” faster/cheaper than that on a Monday night. HK$27 (US$3.47) for a “big n tasty” or whatever — including fries and a drink? Yeah, not going to beat that.

I do miss home a lot though, not like my house per se but football and people from more than just two ethnicities and chocolate soy milk (the only kind of soy milk they don’t have here) and loaves of bread — here you can only buy 8 or so slices at a time.

But I’m getting on, as they (Brits) say, and I’m getting continually more used to it. I have reached my 3/8 point today. I.e., I’ll be leaving 5 weeks from today. My hope is that I will use my time successfully, and not wasted it. How often do you get paid to camp out in a foreign metropolis for a few months? Not often.

One Week on Planet Asia

Executive summary: I’m working in private equity in Hong Kong from July 1 to August 29. It’s cool here, I’m getting used to it, but I’m lonely.

Hong Kong, at least most of the parts I spend time in, is vertical: skyscrapers as far as the eye can see. I work on the top floor of a 78-story building, the 4th tallest in the city. It has a killer view, as you can imagine. 

More than half of the Hong Kong region is actually protected, undeveloped rainforest spread over steep and picturesque mountains. The rest is impossibly packed with people, taxis, and dense buildings (mostly shopping malls—so many shopping malls).

The food is more tolerable than anticipated, and I’ve made it through two extensive dim sum meals without making a total fool of myself. I can use chopsticks OK, but that was practiced a lot before I got here.

Everyone speaks English who needs to, usually just enough to sell you something or give directions. I manage to get lost a lot, because in the great English tradition streets change name every three or four blocks. The subway here is space-age, cheap, and jammed slightly less than sardines. It’s humid and terribly hot, hence the rainforest and the shopping malls.

Reasons the experience isn’t completely positive: my job is a little boring, at least so far. It’s only been a week so I’m not exactly doomed to a tedious existence, and at least I have the other intern to entertain me. I’ve learned enough to know that any finance less interaction-based and more desk-chained than private equity is not what I want to do with my life.

Secondly, I have no friends here besides my fellow intern and his girlfriend! I was on the subway with these 4 American girls and I said hi and I was so stupid not to have gotten their phone numbers or emails. I feel so dumb… seeing them together rushing to a party reminded me how much I would like to have companions here.

So… do you have any friends in Hong Kong? Share them!

Everyone’s reading it! I don’t know how, though. Almost 300 pages in and I’ve barely made a dent.

Everyone’s reading it! I don’t know how, though. Almost 300 pages in and I’ve barely made a dent.

Also, to people who are trying to “change the system”

Don’t whine about it on the internet with a poorly and unsoundly argued—but educated-sounding—rant, plug your own sort of ludicrous solution, and then hope people don’t see the lack of common sense behind your message.

If you want to change the way an industry works, the best way to do that is to establish your own industry, not make some petition with no target—who are you trying to convince anyway?

Don’t try to regulate through Congress because that’s not even giving the people who are doing it wrong the opportunity to fail when someone does it right. Regulation restricts people from doing the wrong thing, but it doesn’t teach them to do the right thing.

Common sense, people.

For Real Guys?

In an age where business dominates our governments and writes our laws, every technological advance offers business an opportunity to impose new restrictions on the public. Technologies that could have empowered us are used to chain us instead.

With printed books,

  • You can buy one with cash, anonymously.
  • Then you own it.
  • You are not required to sign a license that restricts your use of it.
  • The format is known, and no proprietary technology is needed to read the book.
  • You can, physically, scan and copy the book, and it’s sometimes lawful under copyright.
  • Nobody has the power to destroy your book.

Contrast that with Amazon ebooks (fairly typical):

  • Amazon requires users to identify themselves to get an ebook.
  • In some countries, Amazon says the user does not own the ebook.
  • Amazon requires the user to accept a restrictive license on use of the ebook.
  • The format is secret, and only proprietary user-restricting software can read it at all.
  • To copy the ebook is impossible due to Digital Restrictions Management in the player, and prohibited by the license, which is more restrictive than copyright law.
  • Amazon can remotely delete the ebook using a back door. It used this back door in 2009 to delete thousands of copies of George Orwell’s 1984.

Even one of these infringements makes ebooks a step backward from printed books. We must reject ebooks until they respect our freedom.

Most of these arguments are a little silly.

  • Cash only? That argument usually comes up when you’re talking to anti-government paranoids who think that people are, yes, reading (and thus caring about) your credit card statements.
  • Amazon e-books are not all e-books. There are millions that are DRM-free, millions that have less-restrictive DRM, millions from the dozen or so other e-book stores. If you think Amazon e-books are the only e-books you are not only ignorant, you are unqualified to generalize “e-books”.
  • Other e-books do not use a proprietary format. However, you can buy non-Amazon e-books and convert them with software to work on a Kindle.
  • Scanning and copying a printed book is almost never lawful unless you’re writing a book review. The same rules apply for e-books. No, you cannot copy them as, no, you cannot legally copy a printed book.
  • Amazon has the power to destroy only the e-books of people who were dumb enough to buy Kindles (i.e., who did not already realize how creepy Amazon is about this stuff because they didn’t do any research). 
  • Amazon did screw up and delete books, but it was a huge business mistake for them that they took a lot of bad PR for. Don’t think that deleting books somehow fulfills an Amazon agenda—because it doesn’t. They only make money when you’re happy with the books you’ve bought.
  • Lastly, try reading an e-book. It’s not all that bad. It doesn’t “enslave you”. It’s usually entertaining, and let me say that carrying around Infinite Jest on a Nook is a lot more convenient than carrying around the 4 lb. hard copy.

(Source: azspot)

Be jealous I get to upgrade every 6 months.

Yes, I am using a Windows desktop background on Linux. 

Be jealous I get to upgrade every 6 months.

Yes, I am using a Windows desktop background on Linux. 

Do people not realize that every single one of us, from the beginning of America and any other “Western” country have been immigrants? Our countries were built on the back of immigrants. Don’t be stupid.

themetropoliskid:

whatsajuthika:

kinda iffy about the word stupid but yes

this is not true! indigenous populations were not immigrants! slaves forcibly brought over against their own will are not immigrants! we are not a nation of immigrants

We are like 85% a nation of willing immigrants. And I think that the gist is almost every single person here was once an outsider. Pilgrims were, and thousands of years ago, “native” tribes were too. 

Human life didn’t begin in North America. Everyone had to get here and adapt (whether by force or gumption) from somewhere else. Most everything we have comes from the traditions and practices of places far, far away.

(Source: beautifulqalb)

canisfamiliaris:

Mother Teresa: A Modern-Day Saint

I kind of resent this. There are no citations, and very little context for any of the actions. I feel like similarly accusatory statements could be made for thousands of socially valuable people. And I feel like in general, Mother Teresa is considered as socially valuable, having insisted upon providing some degree of medical care to those who would not otherwise have it. 
And the fact that she can lose her faith after seeing suffering and still keep working to alleviate suffering seems to only add to arguments for respecting her contribution to humanity. 
People think Saint means “perfect person.” No. Saint means a miracle within a person, someone who did good despite basic rationality. 
Overall, I think it would be wildly hypocritical to let religious idiosyncracies overwhelm the social mission of a woman who dedicated her life to living among and assisting the poorest people on earth. 

canisfamiliaris:

Mother Teresa: A Modern-Day Saint

I kind of resent this. There are no citations, and very little context for any of the actions. I feel like similarly accusatory statements could be made for thousands of socially valuable people. And I feel like in general, Mother Teresa is considered as socially valuable, having insisted upon providing some degree of medical care to those who would not otherwise have it. 

And the fact that she can lose her faith after seeing suffering and still keep working to alleviate suffering seems to only add to arguments for respecting her contribution to humanity. 

People think Saint means “perfect person.” No. Saint means a miracle within a person, someone who did good despite basic rationality. 

Overall, I think it would be wildly hypocritical to let religious idiosyncracies overwhelm the social mission of a woman who dedicated her life to living among and assisting the poorest people on earth.