(Holly, a student from L.A.) Welcome the blog I brought with me to college. holly_hunt@brown.edu

 

For Real Guys?

In an age where business dominates our governments and writes our laws, every technological advance offers business an opportunity to impose new restrictions on the public. Technologies that could have empowered us are used to chain us instead.

With printed books,

  • You can buy one with cash, anonymously.
  • Then you own it.
  • You are not required to sign a license that restricts your use of it.
  • The format is known, and no proprietary technology is needed to read the book.
  • You can, physically, scan and copy the book, and it’s sometimes lawful under copyright.
  • Nobody has the power to destroy your book.

Contrast that with Amazon ebooks (fairly typical):

  • Amazon requires users to identify themselves to get an ebook.
  • In some countries, Amazon says the user does not own the ebook.
  • Amazon requires the user to accept a restrictive license on use of the ebook.
  • The format is secret, and only proprietary user-restricting software can read it at all.
  • To copy the ebook is impossible due to Digital Restrictions Management in the player, and prohibited by the license, which is more restrictive than copyright law.
  • Amazon can remotely delete the ebook using a back door. It used this back door in 2009 to delete thousands of copies of George Orwell’s 1984.

Even one of these infringements makes ebooks a step backward from printed books. We must reject ebooks until they respect our freedom.

Most of these arguments are a little silly.

  • Cash only? That argument usually comes up when you’re talking to anti-government paranoids who think that people are, yes, reading (and thus caring about) your credit card statements.
  • Amazon e-books are not all e-books. There are millions that are DRM-free, millions that have less-restrictive DRM, millions from the dozen or so other e-book stores. If you think Amazon e-books are the only e-books you are not only ignorant, you are unqualified to generalize “e-books”.
  • Other e-books do not use a proprietary format. However, you can buy non-Amazon e-books and convert them with software to work on a Kindle.
  • Scanning and copying a printed book is almost never lawful unless you’re writing a book review. The same rules apply for e-books. No, you cannot copy them as, no, you cannot legally copy a printed book.
  • Amazon has the power to destroy only the e-books of people who were dumb enough to buy Kindles (i.e., who did not already realize how creepy Amazon is about this stuff because they didn’t do any research). 
  • Amazon did screw up and delete books, but it was a huge business mistake for them that they took a lot of bad PR for. Don’t think that deleting books somehow fulfills an Amazon agenda—because it doesn’t. They only make money when you’re happy with the books you’ve bought.
  • Lastly, try reading an e-book. It’s not all that bad. It doesn’t “enslave you”. It’s usually entertaining, and let me say that carrying around Infinite Jest on a Nook is a lot more convenient than carrying around the 4 lb. hard copy.

(Source: azspot)

  1. existentialfunk reblogged this from nder
  2. tbelle reblogged this from youmustfirstinventtheuniverse and added:
    In the same way we all have rejected electronic music? Technology changes. The book you can buy but the copyright...
  3. quickjam reblogged this from gonzodave and added:
    As much as people have scorned me for personally preferring printed books over e-books… I find it much easier to read a...
  4. starsblinkout reblogged this from theadamglass and added:
    This is gonna start with vehement disagreement, but it’ll end with wholehearted agreement, so bear with me, I guess? I...
  5. lijnegus reblogged this from incipientepiphany
  6. thepsprocess reblogged this from walkthewaves and added:
    In an age where business dominates our governments...writes our laws, every technological...
  7. rashansworld reblogged this from lonelycoast and added:
    This is interesting…not sure if I believe the part about 1984, but these are some valid points.
  8. planetofconfusion reblogged this from abagond
  9. turtlesaurusrex reblogged this from victusinveritas and added:
    And that is why I will never get an ereader
  10. abagond reblogged this from urbanafrofuturism
  11. poopflinginglady reblogged this from nusshkazn
  12. timetoputonashow reblogged this from mutations
  13. theadamglass reblogged this from starsblinkout and added:
    Well, again I think it all comes down to what I feel (and we can keep emphasizing feel) is the difference between...
  14. alinasfire reblogged this from azspot
  15. soumitra reblogged this from azspot and added:
    the last line is so naive though.
  16. starsblinkout reblogged this from theadamglass and added:
    even if I never stop reading....personal. Difficulty
  17. victusinveritas reblogged this from sovietpropaganda
  18. beviandherbunny reblogged this from holden421
  19. ancientdragons reblogged this from wolfdancer
  20. lovelyscents reblogged this from yeahtravisrules
  21. trumpstyle reblogged this from pizzacrust
  22. theadamglass reblogged this from starsblinkout and added:
    While ownership is one of my main issues with digital media, even if the problems there were solved I would still have...
  23. pizzacrust reblogged this from skate-eat-thrash
  24. walkthewaves reblogged this from hollywouldnt
  25. hollywouldnt reblogged this from underthesheets and added:
    paperbacks til death. oh and hardcover. paper til death.
  26. theankou reblogged this from underthesheets and added:
    Buy a fucking printed book people.
  27. myshadowsghost reblogged this from redjeep
  28. yeahtravisrules reblogged this from urbanafrofuturism
  29. underthesheets reblogged this from sovietpropaganda
  30. skate-eat-thrash reblogged this from sovietpropaganda and added:
    This is the exact same way I feel about music. People don’t even leave their house anymore, and they’ve forgotten how...